![]() ![]() I have no plans to purchase another PRS or LP in the near future. I also own 6 of them, so my opinion may be a bit skewed.Īll of the Carvins I own I've purchased used, to save even more cash, but I have plans to order 2 of them custom within the next year, if that tells you anything. ![]() So, if you're looking for value, that would be my vote. Carvin is producing insanely nice guitars right now, IMO.īut here's the thing.whether you're talking new or used, the Carvin will cost half as much as the PRS and it will be considerably less than the Gibson. Smith Custom 22 a Gibson Les Paul Historic Reissue Goldtop HD-28V Acoustic, a Tobacco Burst Fender Stratocaster, a Carvin Custom, a Martin and a Moollon. macdonald, which will fit your epi les paul. In playability I'd give the very slightest edge to PRS over Carvin, but just barely. I am thinking of replacing the generic pickups in my Epi Les Paul Classic to two of the Carvin humbuckers. I would put the LP pickups (57's on mine, BB's on the std) ahead of the PRS or Carvin, with the PRS pickups edging out the Carvin (I'm having trouble getting along with Carvin's stock pup at the bridge, love it in the neck though). and in the late 1940s, legendary guitarist Les Paul had begun working with the. I would put the construction quality of the Carvin and PRS ahead of the LP, bearing in mind that I'm only talking about the three that I actually own. is a California-based manufacturer of electric and acoustic. ![]() Photo: Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick, GFDL. I own a LP Classic Antique, a PRS Custom 22, and a Carvin CT4 (same costruction as CT6, just not a figured top). Church Église de la cité Saint-Paul de Carvin is situated 1½ km east of Stade Jules Delvallez. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |